Dec 27, 2011

林敬賢:解決擾民9年“頑疾”‧“首長快來養雞場聞臭!” Lim:9 Tahun tidak Diselesaikan Masalah,KM Sila Melawat Kilang Ayam!


(馬六甲24日訊)甲郊區瓜拉武吉旺當地一家養雞場帶來污染困擾,當地村民自9年前開始,竭盡所能向各方投訴,可是問題依然存在,村民今天向民聯領袖求助,行動黨峇章州議員林敬賢不禁向甲州首席部長拿督斯里莫哈末阿里發出“邀請”,以便首長能親自前往巡視,並在村裡住上一兩個星期,以體會居民的感受。
該養雞場在2003年開始營業,惡臭味就籠罩著整個村子,令村民健康受損,而且農場帶來的污染更令河水轉為黑色,野生動物也死亡,在過去漫長的9年,村民由下至上,從國陣到反對黨,從州政府至中央政府等,可以投訴的管道都投訴了,雞糞飄臭及污染的問題還是無法解決。
村民表示,就連法庭曾對農場判罪,但是問題依然一樣。
Sebuah kilang ayam yang teletak di kawasan pinggir negeri Melaka telah membawa pencemaran kepada penduduk kampung selama 9 tahun.Walaupun mereka sering membuat aduan,namun masalah masih tidak diselesaikan.Penduduk kampung minta pertolongan Adun Bachang DAP,Sdr Lim Jak Wong untuk memberi "pejemputan" kepada KM Menteri Melaka Ali Rustam untuk membuat lawatan dan tinggal di kampung ini selama 1-2 minggu,barulah beliau faham kepedihan penduduk kampung.
Kilang ayam ini dibuka pada tahun 2003,setelah itu bau busuk menyebar ke seluruh kampung,mengakibatkan kesihatan penduduk kampung terancam,air sungai pun dicemari oleh kilang tersebut,haiwan liar mati kerana terminum air sungai warna hitam itu.Penduduk kampung telah membuat aduan dari BN hingga ke pembangkang,dari kerajaan negeri ke kerajaan pusat,namun masalah ini masih belum diselesaikan.
Seorang Penduduk kampung berkata,walaupun mahkamah telah menjatuhkan hukuman kepada kilang tersebut,keadaan masih sama seperti dahulu.
吳德雄:生態大受影響 Persekitaran Terancam
村民吳德雄今天在新聞發佈會上說,農場公開曝曬雞糞、污水排入溪流、雞糞丟棄在油棕園,除了造成臭味,也造成當地的生態大受影響。
“油棕樹枯死、山豬及山雞都沒有了。”
他表示,村民向環境局、獸醫局、州議員、公共投訴局、部長,甚至首相都投訴了,但是村民依然被迫在臭味中生活。
“到底政府要照顧人民,還是特定的人群?”他不禁發出疑問。”
他指出,在柔佛州,當局關閉了10處被指引起污染的養雞場,但是在武吉旺,獸醫局依然允許這樣的養雞場存在,是否獸醫局持有雙重標准,或是多重標准。
“是否當局認為,雞糞比村民的健康更重要,是不是要等到有人死了,當局才會行動?”
Penduduk kampung,Encik Goh mengkritik,kilang ini mengeringkan tahi ayam di luar,air kotor dibuang ke dalam sungai,tahi ayam dibuang ke dalam dusun kelapa sawit,selain daripada bau busuk,persekitaran kawasan ini teruk diancami.  
"Pokok Kelapa Sawit layu,babi hutan dan ayam hutan dah tiada!"
Beliau berkata,penduduk kampung telah membuat aduan kepada Jabatan Alam Sekitar,Jabatan Perkhidmatan Haiwan,ADUN,Biro Pengaduan Awam,Menteri-menteri serta Perdana Menteri,namun mereka masih mendiami dalam keadaan yang busuk.
"Kerajaan menjaga kepentingan rakyat,atau menjaga pihak yang tertentu shaja?"
Beliau menunjukkan bahwa kerajaan negeri Johor telah menutup 10 kilang ayam yang mencemari alam sekitar,tetapi di Bukit Beruang,Jabatan Perkhidmatan Haiwan membiarkan sahaja,adakah ini double standard?
"Adakah pihak berkenaan menganggap tahi ayam lebih penting daripada kesihatan penduduk kampung?Adakah mereka hendak menunggu seseorang mati,baru mereka membuat sesuatu?"
指村民感覺被政府欺騙 Penduduk Kampung Ditipu Kerajaan
吳德雄表示,村民感覺被政府欺騙,被農場業主欺負。
“環境局把案件帶上法庭,有3名村民作證人,但為何法庭已判罪,養雞場還是一樣可操作?”
他指出,因為時常散發出臭味,住在外的年輕一代及他們的孩子在過年過節時,都害怕回來,令村子裡的老人家非常傷心。
“農曆新年要到了,如果問題沒有解決,我們會採取另一個行動。”
 
Goh berkata,penduduk kampung berasa tertipu oleh kerajaan dan dibuli oleh pemilik kilang.
"Jabatan Alam Sekitat membawa kes ini ke mahkamah,3 orang penduduk kampung dijadikan saksi,mahkamah dah pun menjatuhkan hukuman,kenapa kilang masih beroperasi seperti biasa?"
Beliau bertambah,kerana bau busuk ini,orang muda dan anak-anak mereka enggan balik ke kampung lagi semasa musim perayaan,mengakibatkan kesedihan orang tua.
"Tahun Baru Cina akan tiba tidak lama lagi,kalau masalah ini belum diselesaikan,kita akan menyelesaikannya dengan cara yang lain."
祖拉斯:須找出解決方案
Perlu Diselesaikan Segara


針對此,依斯蘭黨馬日丹那區部主席祖拉斯認為,瓜拉寧宜前任及現任兩名巫統州議員都無法解決問題,就算等到第十任國陣州議員,污染的問題還是一樣。
“我們必須找出一個解決的途徑,做出改變,只有實踐福利國,武吉旺村民的生活才會受到保障。”
他指出,國陣把“人民為先”挂在嘴邊,但是國陣沒有以武吉旺村民為先,卻以雞糞為先。
“為甚麼國陣有權力在手,但問題卻沒有解決?人民要忍到何時?”
他說,農曆新年就快來臨,希望村民在安寧的气氛中過年,子孫可以回鄉團聚,因此,他吁請地方政府、當地州議員及相關的部門,儘快採取行動,把問題解快。
Yang Dipertua PAS Masjid Tanah berkata,bekas serta 2 orang Adun UMNO di Kuala Linggi pun tidak mampu menyelesaikan masalah ini,sampai Adun BN yang ke-10 pun,keadaan ini masih sama.
"Kita harus mencari jalan penyelesaian,membuat perubahan,hanyalah mengamalkan Negara Kebajikan,kehidupan penduduk kampung Bukit Beruang baru dijamin."
Beliau berkata,BN mengantung "Rakyat Didahulukan"di mulut,tapi penduduk kampung ini tidak didahulukan,tahi ayam pula didahulukan.
"Kenapa masalah tidak diselesai walaupun BN memegang kuasa?Sampai bila rakyat nak bersabar?"
Beliau berkata,tahun baru Cina dahlah tiba,mengharapkan penduduk kampung dapat meraikannya dalam keadaan yang damai,anak dan cucu dapat balik menyambut kemeriahan.Jadi,beliau menyeru kerajaan tempatan,Adun kawasan dan pihak berkenaan mengambil tindakan segera untuk menyelesaikan masalah ini.
林敬賢:將帶入州議會反映 Lim:Akan dibawa ke Sidang DUN
峇章區州議員林敬賢挑戰首長拿督斯里莫哈末阿里親自到武吉旺,並且在村子住上一兩個星期,以體會村民的感受。
“早期州政府以養豬場造成污染要關閉養豬場,但是,養雞場的污染不也嚴重嗎?”
他指出,雖然武吉旺的問題曾帶入國會,但政府沒有積極處理,再一次讓人民看清國陣及首長的無能,以及沒有誠意為人民解決問題。
林敬賢表示,他將把武吉旺的問題,帶入州議會內反映,要求政府重視。(星洲日報/古城)
Adun Bachang,Sdr Lim Jak Wong mencabar KM Melaka Ali Rustam membuat lawatan ke Bukit Beruang,dan menetap di kampung ini selama 1-2 minggu,barulah dia dapat merasai perasaan penduduk kampung.
"Kerajaan negeri menutupkan kilang penternakan babi dengan alasan pencemaran,namun,pencemaran kilang ayam ini tidak seriuskah?"
Beliau berkata,walaupun kes ini pernah dibawa ke Parlimen,tetapi kerajaan tidak mengurusnya dengan baik,ternyata lagi kerajaan BN dan KM Melaka adalah tidak berguna,mereka tidak dapat menyelesaikan masalah secara ikhlas.
Sdr Lim berkata,beliau akan mengemukaan masalah ini di sidang DUN yang akan datang,demi rakyat,beliau akan mendesak kerajaan untuk menyelesaikan perkara ini.

郊外學生人數持續偏低‧甲州市區華小新生爆滿~~~“国阵-马华说好的华小呢?市区几时增建华小?”


(馬六甲21日訊)再多半個月即2012年新學年開學,甲州華小已報名的明年一年級新生報讀人數如往常般,出現市區與郊區明顯偏差現象,郊區人數持續偏低,市區一些大型學校不是已經爆滿,就是接近滿額。
其中,育民小學明年一年級新生報名人數暴漲至180人,共開5班,已經滿額;而剛搬遷至古魯蒙的培一也因為環境利好因素,明年新學年的一年級新生報讀人數從今年2名,暴漲到59人,共開2班。
文化學校新生料冠全甲州
峇株安南的文化學校明年新生報讀人數達到230人,相信又是全甲最多新生的華小,共開5班
至於郊區方面,例如亞羅牙也縣及野新縣的一些華小的新生報讀人數普遍偏低,有者數十人,有者甚至只有8人,而且沒有華裔。
甲市育民小學今年的一年級學生是154人,明年報讀一年級者暴增至180人,而且比今年多開一班,達到5班,明年全校學生人數也超過1千人
校方指出,由於不想一班的學生人數太過擁擠,因此,一年級已經停止接受報名。
文化小學校長王進南告訴《古城》,已報名該校的明年報讀一年級的新生有230人,共開5班。其中,華裔220人、巫裔10人;全校學生人數達1千362人。
李秋英:培一剛遷校新生暴增
至於剛剛遷校的培一小學校長李秋英指出,遷校之後,報讀明年一年級的人數明顯地比今年的增加很多,今年只有2名新生,明年則暴漲至59人,共開2班。
她說,除了一年級新生已經滿額,其他班級還是開放給有意報讀培一的學生申請。“由於我們剛剛遷校,目前還在等待教育局有關招收學生人數的進一步指示,加上開學後學生人數會有增有減,所以暫時不能估計明年全校學生人數。”
她歡迎其他年級的學生報讀該校,特別是就讀古魯蒙一帶的家長,可以考慮讓孩子就讀培一。任何詢問可聯絡李秋英校長,電話:017-6384549。
林麗潔:培德小學新生稍減
培德小學校長林麗潔表示,已報名就讀該校明年一年級的新生有65人,共有2班,較去年76人稍微減少。
她說,其中一年級新生只有1人是巫裔,其餘的64人都是華裔。“我在這裡掌校已經7年,每年的新生人數大致相同,我們也不想每班人數太多,因為大班不好教,儘量維持一班35人左右。”
培德小學明年的全校學生人數是426人。
招茂小學不再接受報名
亞羅牙也招茂小學明年有156人報讀明年一年級,其中華裔佔大多數,有144名,巫裔10名及印裔2名,共開4班。
校方指出,一年級新生人數幾近爆滿,應該不會再接受報名。明年的全校學生人數是860名
張月芳:學習環境佳
友族生報讀華小增加
華小辦學認真,學習環境佳深獲友族同胞讚賞,無論市區郊區華小每年一年級新生都有友族,這種情況尤其在明顯,一些微型華小,明年甚至沒有一名華裔新生,全是友族新生。
敦化小學校長張月芳表示,該校明年一年級新生只有8人,沒有華裔。其中7名巫裔,1名印裔。全校學生人數只有47名。
她說,該校今年的一年級學生也只有6人,僅有的一名華裔生也在今年5月轉校。
萬里茂華小方面,明年有45名一年級新生,其中華裔36名、巫裔6名、印裔2名,以及葡萄牙後裔1名。
至於馬日丹那華小,明年一年級新生共有67名,友族就佔了25名,其中巫裔20名、印裔3名及其他種族2名;華裔是42名。全校學生人數達354名。
(星洲日報/古城)

Kempen Derma Darah Anjuran DAP Cawangan Merlimau & Sungai Rambai Dengan Kerjasama Pas Kawasan Jasin 万里茂行动党与伊斯兰党合办捐血运动




Tempat 地点:Dewan Tokong Hoe Sein Teng,Batu Gajah Pasir,Merlimau.万里茂鹤仙亭

Hari 日期:1/1/2012 (Ahad)2012年1月日(星期日)

Masa 时间: 9.00am-2.00pm 上午9时至下午2时

Sila Hubungi 请联络:

En. Lui(0193663303),En.Lim(0163328809),En.Deo(0173857998),Cik Fook(0196266618),En.Tan(0126315892),En.Chai(0196370122),En.Aminiddin Abdul Jalil(0196577504),En Abdul Karim Kassim(0136212152),dan YB En. Tey Kok Kiew(0126180880).

Dec 18, 2011

甘迪、陳仲祥、楊勝利‧甲州火箭準候選人亮相 Calon Dap Melaka Bakal Muncul!



(馬六甲17日訊)馬六甲行動黨下屆“準候選人”昨晚率先粉墨登場,先讓選民留個印象!


首次登場的兩張新面孔是行動黨副主席甘迪及財政陳仲祥律師,另一人則是上屆大選上陣魯容對壘甲州馬華聯委會主席拿督顏天祿的“峇峇楊”楊勝利律師。
三人在行動黨45週年黨慶暨籌募大選基金晚宴上發表簡短演說,針對一些時事發表意見,讓出席者認識自己。

“Calon”DAP Melaka memberi ceramah sempena jamuan makan malam Ulang Tahun ke-45 DAP Melaka.

Timbalan Pengerusi,Sdr Gandhi serta Chin Choong Seong memberi ucapan dahulu,seterusnya adalah giliran bekas-calon Dun Duyong,Sdr Baba Damien Yeo.Walaupun ucapan mereka amat pendek,namun pengenalan mereka adalah amat penting sekali.

此外,在台上亮相的老將包括黨主席吳良山州議員、甲市區國會議員沈同欽,台下出席者則有州議員林敬賢、邱培棟及鄭國球,還有之前曾任候選人的副主席吳良忠及秘書廖政光.







吳良山:盼公眾給予支持
吳良山致詞時表示,上台發表演說的是極可能上陣的“準候選人”,不管是華人、印度人還是馬來人,或到哪裡上陣,都希望大家多多給他們支持。
“我們不要天兵下來,我們要馬六甲人打馬六甲的地方。”
他強調,行動黨要那些為黨、為人民奮鬥的行動黨人出來競選,而不要看到其他人來參與競選,因此,只有符合行動黨鬥爭理念的人士才可競選,否則可能出現許多許月鳳,造成民聯政府倒台。

Pengerusi DAP Melaka,Sdr Goh Leong memberi ucapan beliau bahwa tidak kira calon itu kaum Cina,India atau Melayu,tidak kira mana mereka bertanding,harap rakyat dapat memberi sokongan terhadap mereka.

Selain itu,"Kita membantah calon payung terjun,kita mahu orang Melaka bertanding di Melaka."

Beliau bertambah,DAP nak calon yang berjuang demi rakyat dan parti,bukan pihak yang lain,jadi seseorang calon wajib mempunyai semangat perjuangan,janganlah macam Hee Yit Foong yang mengakibatkan keruntuhan kerajaan negeri PR Perak.
將上陣魯容對壘顏天祿同時,吳良山再三強調,本身肯定會上陣魯容對壘顏天祿,“行動黨除了要保留原本的5席之外,我們也要拿下魯容、吉里望和萬望,讓馬華‘打包回家’。”

Sdr Goh menegas,kali ini beliau janji bertanding di Dun Duyong untuk berhadapan dengan Gan Tian Loo.Dap Melaka janji akan memegang 5 Dun yang kita ada,dan menawan Dun Duyong,Klebang dan Bemban,biarkanlah MCA "tapau"balik rumah!
昨晚在馬六甲露夜園酒家舉行的甲行動黨45週年黨慶暨籌募大選基金晚宴宴開180席,全部餐券售鑿;同時,現場籌募9千110令吉。

另外,台上致詞嘉賓包括柔佛行動黨主席巫程豪醫生、行動黨顧問林吉祥國會議員、全國大選備戰委員會文宣組組長丘光耀、回教黨甲州主席阿德里及公正黨甲州主席三蘇伊斯干達。

马六甲民主行动党45周年党庆晚宴精华


伊斯干達:安華若無罪釋放國陣將選舉
三蘇伊斯干達認為,若1月9日審判結果是安華無罪釋放,國陣勢必趁著大家感覺良好時很快舉行大選。
他說,反之若安華被判入牢,人民示威反對為安華抱不平的話,國陣則不敢舉行大選。


Shamsul Iskandar:Kalau Keputusan mahkamah tamat dan DSAI dilepaskan,BN akan mengadakan PRU semasa rakyat berasa sangat baik.


Kalau DSAI dijatuh hukum penjara,maka rakyat akan menuntut keadilan untuk DSAI,jadi BN tidak akan mengadakan PRU.

阿德里:榴槤洞葛民聯勝算高


阿德里表示,民聯有機會在榴槤洞葛勝出,因為各族人民的支持非常顯著。
“不過,我們需要大家踴躍出來投票,就會有這個希望。”


Adly Zahari:PR mempunyai peluang untuk memenangi kerusi Dun Durian Tunggal,kerana sokongan rakyat berbilang kaum amat ketara.


Namun,Saya perlu meminta kalian supaya keluar mengundi,baru kita mempunyai harapan.


沈同欽:人民需要國家制度化




沈同欽表示,人民要的是一個制度化國家,而不是靠議員來爭取免地稅、延長地契或撥款,這些已不是人民想要的。
“以前大家從不談改朝換代,現在人人都在問甚麼時候改朝換代,證明大家很想要它實現。


Sim Tong Him:Rakyat memerlukan sebuah negara yang sistematik,bukan bergantung kepada Adun tentang isu seperti mengecualikan cukai tanah,melanjutkan geran tanah atau peruntukan,ini bukan kehendakan rakyat.


Dulu kita tidak berani membicara tentang tukar kerajaan,sekarang pula rakyat yang bertanya bila kerajaan ditukar,ternyat ia mungkin menjadi impian.

马六甲民主行动党45週年黨慶及大選基金籌募晚宴 Jamuan Makan Malam DAP Melaka 16/12/2011
















若民聯執政‧丘光耀自薦任反貪總監


(馬六甲17日訊)行動黨全國大選備戰委員會文宣組組長丘光耀聲言,待民聯執政後,他要自薦出任反貪污委員會總監,並有信心在兩年內改進貪污指數。
“身為大馬國民,最希望看到自己的國家越來越進步,而不是貪污情況越來越嚴重。所以,若將來民聯有機會執政,我會向拿督斯里安華提出這項要求。”
他週五晚為馬六甲行動黨45週年黨慶暨來屆大選基金籌募晚宴發表壓軸演講時說,民聯上台後將落實“百日新政”,其中5項好事是長者每年可領1000令吉、人民享有免費水供、主要城市免費上網、教師加薪500令吉及開放衛星電視的領空。
“所謂還政予民,就是還富予民。”
他披露,他結婚10年來不敢生子,主要是因為對國家的專制統治沒信心,但未來若由民聯執政,他會和太太生一個“Superboy”。
丘光耀說,他鐵定會在下屆大選挑戰馬華總會長拿督斯里蔡細歷,但他強調與蔡細歷沒有私人恩怨,他也沒有詛咒蔡細歷,之前發表的言論是針對馬華這個政黨,而非個人,希望蔡細歷不要有“政治妄想”或“政治自虐”症。
“如果蔡細歷下屆大選不上陣,我將改為挑戰其兒子蔡智勇。”
他指出,安華案將於明年1月9日下判,全世界都在關心安華的下場,而最騎虎難下的莫過於首相拿督斯里納吉。
“首相和夫人最希望安華因肛交案被判入牢,卻又擔心引起另一場‘烈火莫熄’活動。”
針對納吉宣佈廢除內安法令一事,他認為,若納吉真有誠意,理應效仿台灣總統馬英九處理二二八國民黨屠殺土著事件的方式,成立諒解委員會,對曾受內安法令之苦的人士或家屬作出賠償。
(光明日報)

林吉祥:大選或改朝換代‧巫統為保政權恐嚇巫裔 Kit Siang:Ubah Kerajaan.UMNO mengugut Kaum Melayu



(馬六甲17日訊)行動黨全國顧問林吉祥相信,下一屆大選人民有很大的機會能夠改朝換代,所以巫統會設法保住他們的地位,包括落實各種不公平的選舉措施和手段,以及恐嚇選民,尤其恐嚇馬來人。
他說,巫統恫言行動黨將反馬來人、反蘇丹及反伊斯蘭,日後若執政將廢掉蘇丹成立共和國,主要的目的是要讓馬來人感到恐慌。
“我們必須瞭解巫統的議程,運用理智去思考及分析,不要受他們的挑撥影響,因為我們有權利團結起來進行改朝換代。”
林吉祥昨晚出席馬六甲行動黨45週年黨慶晚宴致詞時,這麼表示。

Penasihat kebangsaan DAP Lim Kit Siang percaya,kemungkinan kita dapat menukar kerajaan pada PRU yang akan datang,jadi UMNO mampu menggunakan taktik kotor dan segala penipuan untuk mengugut pengundi,terutamanya kaum Melayu.

UMNO memberi amaran kepada kaum Melayu bahwa DAP anti-Melayu,anti-Sultan dan anti-Islam,serta menubuhkan negara republik,bertujuaan untuk menakutkan kaum Melayu.

“Kita mesti memahami agenda UMNO,dan mengaji secara bijak,jangan diperdayai oleh sebarang ancaman mereka,kita mempunyai hak bersatu untuk menukar kerajaan.”

改朝換代為建公平制度 Tukar kerajaan demi sistem yang lebih adil
他呼吁大家傳達訊息給馬來同胞,請他們不要受巫統的言論影響,改朝換代並非對付馬來人,而是要建立一個公平合理制度的國家。
他說,民聯是一個三大成員黨平起平坐的政治聯盟,但國陣並非如此,例如馬華就沒有與巫統平起平坐。
他說,這是為何在國家獨立54年之後,民聯要成立新的政府,以便讓國外人才回流大馬,一起來建立公平的國家,讓各族享有一等公民的地位。

Beliau menyeru semua menghantar mesej ini kepada kaum Melayu,untuk memastikan mereka tidak terperdaya oleh fitnahan UMNO.Menukar kerajaan bukan untuk menindas Melayu,tetapi untuk menubuhkan negara yang menpunyai sistem keadilan.

PR adalah sebuah parti komponen politik yang samarata,bukan seperti BN,status UMNO dan MCA adalah berbeda.

Beliau bertambah lagi,PR menubuh kerajaan baru untuk menarik balik bakat-bakat di luar negara,bersama-sama kita menubuhkan negara yang adil serta mengembalikan status samarata sebagai seseorang warganegara.


大馬貪污指數每況愈下 Kadar rasuah Malaysia semakin buruk
此外,林吉祥表示,國際透明組織於1995年公佈41個國家貪污指數時,我國排名23,貪污指數為5.1至5.32;這份報告被當時首相敦馬哈迪評為歐洲國家不懷好意的破壞聲譽之作,但我國基本上過後每況愈下。
他說,2003年我國排名37,2004年敦阿都拉上台任首相後,排名跌至46,2010年在首相納吉任期間更下滑至57,今年則排名60。
“中國貪污問題在這些年來不斷減少改進,我們卻一直向後退,2000年至2009年流出國外的黑錢已超過一兆令吉。”

Sdr Kit Siang berkata,kadar rasuah yang dikemukakan oleh Transparency International pada tahun 1995,kedudukan Malaysia adalah 23,kadarnya di antara 5.1-5.32,report ini dikritik oleh bekas PM Dr Mahathir bahwa ini adalah konspirasi negara Eropah,namun ini adalah kebenaran.

Beliau berkata,pada tahun 2003,kedudukan negara kita jatuh ke 37,selepas Abdullah   Badawi jadi PM,kedudukan terus jatuh ke 46,selepas Najib jadi PM,lagi padah,57.Dan pada tahun ini pula,60.

"Kadar rasuah China berkurang setiap tahun,kita pula masih jatuh berturut-turut,dari tahun 2000-2009,wang haram negara kita yang mengalir ke luar negara telah mencapai RM1Trillion!"

Dec 16, 2011

Guan Eng: Umno ancam kepentingan Melayu, bukannya DAP

Malaysian Insider November 27, 2011



KUALA LUMPUR, 27 Nov — Setiausaha Agung DAP Lim Guan Eng menegaskan parti itu tidak pernah menjadi ancaman kepada kepentingan orang Melayu, sebaliknya hanya Umno, yang merupakan komponen teras Barisan Nasional (BN) mempamerkan sifat-sifat sedemikian.
Sehubungan itu kata Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang ini, Umno bukan sahaja menjadi ancaman kepada orang Melayu tetapi juga kepada rakyat Malaysia dengan sikapnya yang menggunakan dan mempertahankan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia, rasuah dan salah guna kuasa.
“Dengan menanam rasa takut serta menggunakan ugutan, Umno mengaburkan mata rakyat daripada skandal-skandal kewangan dan rasuah yang telah mengakibatkan kehilangan beratus-ratus bilion ringgit,” kata beliau dalam satu kenyataan hari ini.
Lim (gambar) berkata selama ini Umno telah menggunakan taktik kejam untuk menipu dan menanam perasaan takut di kalangan orang Melayu, kononnya DAP menjadi pengancam kepada hak dan kepentingan mereka.
“Ini langsung tidak berasas kerana perkhidmatan awam, polis dan tentera semuanya dikawal Melayu. Manakala sektor-sektor kritikal dalam ekonomi seperti insurans, perbankan, industri automobil, pelabuhan dan lebuh raya semuanya juga dikawal oleh usahawan-usahawan atau syarikat-syarikat Melayu,” katanya.
Dalam kenyataannya, Lim menambah, tindakan Timbalan Perdana Menteri Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin yang juga Timbalan Presiden Umno mempertahankan agenda perkauman partinya dan bahawa beliau adalah Melayu dahulu dan rakyat Malaysia kemudian merupakan bukti bahawa 1 Malaysia adalah slogan kosong yang hanya bertujuan untuk mengaut undi dan akan dibuang selepas pilihan raya umum ke-13.
“Yang lebih mengejutkan, Muhyiddin tidak merasa bahawa tindakannya untuk memperjuangkan agenda perkauman Melayu adalah bercanggah atau tidak konsisten dengan agenda rakyat Malaysia bukan Melayu.
“Malah Muhyiddin menggunakan logik yang tidak masuk akal bahawa pemimpin DAP seperti Lim Kit Siang dan saya merupakan Cina cauvinis walaupun DAP telah berjuang untuk semua rakyat Malaysia dan keahlian parti kita terbuka kepada semua termasuk Melayu, India, Iban dan Kadazan.
“Muhyiddin dengan mudah juga telah lupa bahawa saya telah dipenjarakan dan kehilangan kerusi Parlimen kerana memperjuangkan nasib seorang gadis Melayu bawah umur yang menjadi mangsa rogol,” katanya lagi.
Semalam, Muhyiddin merasmikan Seminar Kebangsaan Pemahaman Wasatiyyah dan 1Malaysia dengan berkata pendekatan wasatiyyah atau kesederhanaan bersesuaian dengan komposisi masyarakat majmuk di negara ini demi mengekalkan keamanan dan keharmonian yang dikecapi.
Muhyiddin berkata sikap fanatik dan taksub akan menyebabkan seseorang itu menutup fikiran mereka daripada menerima sebarang maklumat daripada pihak yang tidak mereka senangi.
Beliau berkata gagasan 1 Malaysia yang membawa nilai-nilai aspirasi seperti budaya berprestasi tinggi, ketepatan, budaya ilmu, integriti, ketabahan, kesetiaan, kebijaksanaan dan budaya inovasi turut diterap dan dibudayakan dengan konsep kesederhanaan.
Muhyiddin berkata matlamat akhir pendekatan wasatiyyah masih tidak lari daripada usaha mempertingkatkan kualiti hidup ummah, sama ada daripada segi penguasaan ilmu pengetahuan, pembangunan insan, sistem ekonomi dan kewangan, perpaduan, pertahanan, kenegaraan dan sebagainya.
。。。

Goh Leong San: Making Inroads in Melaka('The Rocket' Interview)

The Rocket Wednesday, December 8, 2010

The Rocket took a tour down to the historic city of Melaka to get to know the state DAP chairman and state assemblyman for Kesidang, Goh Leong San. He shared his views on the key issues facing Melaka, the prospects of Pakatan Rakyat in the state and the future of DAP as a whole.

Full name: Goh Leong San
Education: Bachelor of Science and Master of
Science in Chemistry, Universiti Sains Malaysia
State DAP Post: State Chairman
State Assembly Representative since: 1995
Other Activities: Household products manufacturing
Age: 43


Tell us about yourself and what you are currently doing?

I was born and bred in Melaka. I completed my tertiary education at Universiti Sains Malaysia in Penang, obtaining a Bachelor and Master degrees in Chemistry. I was working as a chemist before taking the plunge into politics.
As for my personal life, I am married and am a father of three children. I am also currently involved in manufacturing household products.

As for my political career, it all started in 1995, when I stood as a candidate for the first time in the Tengkera state seat. I contested in Tengkera in 1999, changing to Bandar Hilir in 2004. I contested again in Tengkera (now renamed Kesidang) in 2008.

What motivated you to join politics?

While I was a student in Penang, it was a time of political upheaval in the nation. I became interested in and followed the political scene in Penang closely. Incidentally, Penang was witnessing a keen contest for the forming of the state government between BN and DAP. I would avidly attend the DAP ceramahs during the 1990 general elections and this stirred up my interest in politics.

At the same time, I was also being impacted by the government’s implementation of the NEP (New Economic Policy). As I was about to graduate with my Masters degree in chemistry, I applied to be a lecturer but I was denied the opportunity to do so as the university was making it hard for non-Bumiputeras to apply for the lecturer’s post. I felt that something was wrong with the government policy as any qualified and capable graduate should be able to be considered for any occupation he chooses and not be denied the chance simply due to his racial or religious background.

As the sense of being wronged well up in me, I felt the urge to fight for this injustice which would surely be causing hardship for others as well. So I joined DAP in 1994 and started as a volunteer in Melaka DAP, helping to translate some news articles and doing preparation work for the 1995 general elections. I was an assistant in DAP Secretary General Lim Guan Eng’s office then.

Why did you choose DAP? What were the aspects of the party that stood out for you?

I did not consider BN as I saw that the mismanagement of the country was due to their governance and stance. So I felt it was necessary for me to choose a party that had people who would fight to right the wrongs in the system and to have the support from the people in their cause.

As DAP was fighting based on the ‘Malaysian First’ concept, I saw an ideal which I could identify with. As a Malaysian, I think we all deserve to be granted equal rights. This was the main appeal for me and it made DAP a natural choice.

What are some of the challenges that an elected representative faces every day?

One key challenge is raising awareness amongst the people on the issues of the day; we often encounter a resistant attitude from them as the BN-controlled media does a very good job of blanking out the government’s bad news.

Two examples that comes to mind are the Paya Mengkuang 2007 closure of pig farms and the Tanah Merah forced land acquisition by the state government in ‘94/’95. We were trying to distribute leaflets to the people to inform them about these issues, but the people were apprehensive about receiving things from DAP as the fear of being associated with the opposition parties was strong. This is still visible amongst some of the older folks even to this day. I also received similar treatment when I was contesting for the Alor Gajah parliamentary seat in 2004.

This “paranoia” of the opposition parties sometimes grips the people so much and can be seen in the fundraising dinner attendance. Some have told me they do not dare to attend fundraising dinners held by DAP for the fear that they might be seen and have their pictures taken by the Special Branch (SB) police. They believe that they would be spied upon and then hassled in their daily affairs.



What is the political landscape in Melaka now? How have things changed in the last two years?
After the March 2008 elections, there has been a visible change in the people’s attitude towards the opposition parties. They are more willing to consider what we tell them. Many of the independent (non-partisan) voters are beginning to believe that DAP can form government and be effective in fulfilling our promises.
In the past, we were quite conservative in our political expectations; we were only telling the people that we will attempt to be a better and more effective opposition. The thought of forming the government even at the state level was far from us.

Now, with DAP forming the state government in Penang, Melaka folks are seeing for themselves the capabilities of DAP leaders. The DAP-led Penang state government is often held up as a good example by the people. They are remarking on Lim Guan Eng’s stellar performance in running the state government which has generated a budget surplus and returned the money to the people. Of course, even with all these positive external factors, we still need to work well with our Pakatan Rakyat (PR) partners to keep the momentum going.


What are the biggest issues that are affecting the political scenario in Melaka?


The BN Melaka state government, in power since Merdeka, has generated enough problems on its own. On the surface, Melaka seems to be out of the bad press. However, with people’s political awareness raised since 2008, they are beginning to question on the efficacy and integrity of this UMNO-led government.

One prominent example is the reputation of the current Melaka Chief Minister. He was indicted in the 2009 UMNO party elections for unethical campaigning. Though he may have been cleared of any wrongdoing, the people’s perception towards his integrity has deteriorated.
In the past the politics of development had a strong hold on the people’s mindset. The people genuinely believed that only BN could bring development to the country. As a result, BN was milking this sentiment for all that it was worth.

After the 2008 political tsunami, the people’s way of thinking about the politics of development has changed. They accept that development is only one small part of good governance. They are also beginning to see that development comes from taxpayers’ money and not by the grace of the government. So the effectiveness of using development as a weapon by BN is somewhat blunted now.

Moving on to the micro level, we see several issues that may occupy the people’s concern. One example is the housing quota for the bumiputera population, which currently stands at 60 percent, one of the highest in the country. The BN controlled media and Kedah BN elected representatives were making a fuss about the proposed 50 percent bumiputera housing quota in PR-led Kedah; Melaka has been practising this 60 percent for years already.

Now, as a result of this policy, we have 1,489 houses left unsold throughout the state. The estimated value of these houses comes to about RM150 million. The state government refused to allow them to be sold at the open market. To appease the developers, the state government agencies were directed to acquire them using taxpayers’ money and bank loans and then rent them out to tenants. For a small state such as Melaka, which has state budget and revenue of around RM300 million, this figure is substantial.

In addition, we have many failed projects that are scattered throughout the state. We have the Batu Berendam International Airport, which has just two flights a day to one destination in Indonesia. Yet it has cost the taxpayers millions of ringgit.

We also have the infamous failed “Eye on Malaysia” project, the Malacca International Motorsports Circuit (MIMC) in Durian Tunggal, a go-kart racing track which claims to be the biggest in the South East Asia region but is in fact under-utilised and another international bowling centre which has been taken over by a state government agency which is under-utilised as well.

In Melaka city itself, the flood problems have been plaguing the city centre for the past few years. Due to massive land reclamation project around the town area, water drainage for rain requires a longer distance to reach the sea. The state government has recently declared Melaka as a developed city, yet flash floods are a recurrent event in the town. How do they justify this declaration?

To understand the magnitude of these flash floods, we can see that the state government has been compensating the people by providing a RM200 grant to each house affected by the floods, for a total RM40.9 million from 2004 to 2010. That comes to an average of over 34,000 households being affected by the floods over the past six years.

Recently, Melaka DAP was in the news for voicing out about the malpractice in the distribution of these compensations. We were submitting the compensation claims on behalf of the households affected by the floods; however due to political considerations, the government departments did not process the claims we sent as they chose to only process those submitted by the JAPERUN (State Legislative Assembly Development and Coordination Committee) or JKKK (Village Development and Security Committee). We held a demonstration in front of the house of the MCA state executive committee member responsible for the disbursement of this flood compensation grants.

These flash flood problems are not just confined to Melaka city. Many people think it is a problem mostly faced by the residents in the opposition controlled areas but it also frequently affects the smaller towns such as Jasin and Masjid Tanah, which are pro-BN.

What are the people’s perceptions toward Pakatan Rakyat in Melaka?


The enthusiasm of the people towards PR is growing. Some of the people are keen for the next general elections to come so that they can vote for a new government. We are confident that the Chinese and Indian communities are generally supportive of PR. As for the Malay voters, most of our votes will be coming from the PAS voter base.

Generally for the fence sitters, many have indicated that they want to see PR form the next state government.

Based on the people’s sentiments, what are the prospects of PR advancing politically in Melaka?


From analysing the voting trends in 2008, we managed to obtain about 20 percent of the Malay votes, over 75 percent of the Chinese votes and a fairly high percentage of the Indian votes in the areas we contested.

Now in this new political environment, we estimate that with an additional 10 percent voters swing to PR, we will be able to win some of the UMNO-controlled state seats. This will especially aid PAS in winning some of these UMNO seats. Melaka city and southern Melaka state seats such as Durian Tunggal, Telok Mas, Ayer Molek, Merlimau, and Sungai Rambai also look promising for PR.

In 2008, DAP contested two parliamentary and eight state seats. We won one parliamentary and five state seats. If 10 percent more of the voters would swing to our side, we stand a good chance of capturing two more state seats, namely Kelebang and Duyong.

As for our chances of forming the next state government, I think we are still pretty far from reaching that stage. We would need to work doubly hard to close the gap between us and BN. However, if the current political climate continues, we stand a good chance of denying BN the two-thirds majority in the state assembly.

Overall, there are some macro factors that may swing the outcome for us. Melaka is a fairly developed state with a high number of urban residents. Generally, urban voters’ nationwide are geared towards voting for opposition parties. However in Melaka’s case, the pro-BN sentiment is still very strong amongst the voters, even in the newly developed townships. We hope that the Melaka people working out of town, especially in the big cities, would begin to influence the thinking of their parents and relatives in politics and voting. This could be the catalyst for more changes in the political scene.

What are the hurdles that PR has to overcome?


Generally, we have a good working relationship with the PR parties. We have been holding many ceramahs and talks which we often invite other PR party leaders to speak in. There is a sense of team spirit building up. However, some difficult matters still need to be ironed out.

In the past, for many of the seats that were pro-BN, especially those outside of Melaka city, the opposition parties generally just post candidates in the seat to contest in order to prevent BN from having a walkover win without regard to the quality of the candidates. This was especially true before 2008. Now with the evolving political scenario, it becomes crucial to have good and qualified candidates to stand in these areas. PR is still facing problems in this aspect.

In terms of electioneering work, the strategies discussed amongst the state PR leaders have to be translated into actions on the ground. Each component party needs to work hard in pushing through the strategies. The PR leaders have to instil confidence amongst the grassroots members of their leadership and to meet them more frequently, not just during elections.

Amongst the three PR parties, PKR is the weakest link. We hope they will buck up in their efforts to improve on their organisation and electioneering work. We can only give suggestions; the rest is in their hands.

We do consider the fact that PKR is still a young party. We have been through the same path as they did, with some of our past and present elected representatives having jumped parties too. We, too, have members quitting the party in a huff. We understand they are going through a growing up phase as well. But they need to pull together and work hard in their assigned areas.

What are the challenges for DAP to progress ahead? What are the solutions?


In the past, it was quite difficult to convince many people that DAP is a multi-racial party. We were having difficulty in attracting people from diverse ethnic and religious background to join the party, especially the Malays. This was due to the misperception created by the BN-controlled media. They did a good job in scaring the Malays into thinking that if DAP were to come to power, the Chinese would control the state and their rights will be taken away. Now with this changing environment, it gives us a better opportunity to be able to reach out to the Malay community.

In the past, we had many Malay sympathisers. However, they had to maintain a low profile as it was a stigma within the Malay community to be identified as a DAP supporter. Many of them were ostracised for their overt support for DAP, causing some difficulties in their daily lives.

Now as DAP is a part of PR, it is no longer a taboo for the Malays to openly support us. In addition, with the availability of the Internet news and blogs, DAP is able to explain on what we stand and fight for. It is a good platform to attract more Malays and Indians to join us.

However, there are still some challenges as well. We have been trying to attract more Indian and Malay members, but we are facing competition from other parties such as PKR and PAS.

As for us in Melaka, we have been embarking on reaching out to the Malays through various programs. One example is the rice donation program for residents in Taman Pandan Mawar, which is a predominantly Malay area near our state headquarters. 800 packets of rice were contributed by a DAP supporter and given out to the residents during the recent flash floods. We are seeing some results from these efforts.

Nowadays, the Malays are getting more receptive towards us when we approach them. We have been using Balai Islam, which are owned by PAS, to reach out to the Malays. We have also been regularly donating goods for their festivities such as Hari Raya Aidilfitri and Aidiladha, which they have received with open hearts.

To give an indication of this increasing receptivity amongst the Malays towards DAP, we use the example of our state party headquarters office. In the past, it was very rare for any Malay to approach the office to request for any assistance. After 2008, some of the Malay residents in this area have been approaching us to request for help in applying for such things as welfare assistance from the government. Some have even asked us to assist them in applying for “wang khairat” (welfare aid) from the state religious department. Even though we are not able to sign the forms on their behalf, we believe every effort matters in reaching out to them.


http://daprocket.com/en/?p=208

Dec 15, 2011

Malacca DAP With Sdr Hew Kuan Yau (GE Preparation Meeting) 马六甲民主行动党大选备战会议







现场转播 - 45週年黨慶及大選基金籌募晚宴 45th Anniversary Dinner of DAP Melaka-LIVE Broadcast

2011年12月16日当晚,我们将为您现场转播“45週年黨慶及大選基金籌募晚宴”。请留意本部落格!~


We will present to you our live broadcast of the 45th Anniversary DAP Melaka Dinner ONLINE,on 16th December 2011,Stay Tune~~





Brought To You By:

Dec 14, 2011

两种族制是国阵的镜子


自308大选有数州改朝换代后,种族政治仍然大行其道,特别是那些挂着“一马”标志者,仍不懈分裂族群,为了他们的如意算盘,硬要把民选的政府诬蔑成“两种族制”。若在一个民主成熟的国家,这确实会让人笑破肚皮,代议士代表的是全民,何来什么两种族、三种族?
据某君于《光华日报.异言堂》分析槟州议会是“两种族制”来看,根本是自圆其说、自打嘴巴。不知槟州人是否还记得,1995年在野党在槟议会仅剩区区几席时,国阵和在野党能分什么庭、抗什么礼?

民联执政槟州后,就由于华裔比率在槟内阁占多数,就等同于种族对立的政府?这句话未免也太伤槟州选民了吧?若说民联的非土著议员有25名,土著议员仅占4名,那2008年大选分配的竞选议席中,民政党加上马华公会的议席共有23席,加上国大党2席;相对巫统的15席,也不等于是“两种族制”吗?

槟州国阵政府多年来非华裔比率都占多数,为何某君也不质疑它到底健不健康?更有趣的是,彭文宝竟然被称赞为“有效监督政府”,而且“好过现在”。但1995至2008年,槟州在只有一位在野党议员、国阵一党独大的状态下,有效监督又能发挥什么效果?

让我不解的是,巫统炒作种族课题,竟然也是民联政府的错,那国阵内的非巫统成员党该扮演什么角色?某君借媒体充当借口,归咎于行动党滥用中文媒体激起华裔等的同情?难道马来西亚媒体在苛法重重的氛围下还有选择吗?马来媒体被巫统骑劫,就连英文报也有巫统和马华的影子,莫怪国人们都赞扬中文报给予的平台是中肯且中立的,因为308后,中文报对朝野政党新闻的比率是五五。

但每当你翻阅主流马来媒体,在野党(或民联州政府)新闻不是看比率划分,而是看有什么课题能拿来羞辱及抹黑。而且,某君的事实也并非事实,目前许多中文报章都有翻译外报的专栏,英文报和马来文报都有,中文报读者岂会不知?若仍然深感迷惑,我倒建议中文报读者去购买巫英文主流报来看,他们始终会发觉其政治新闻都偏袒某方,不然就是出言不逊、满口种族腔调,原来这就是“监督和质问”?那丘光耀岂不很委屈?有得你挑逗种族情绪,没我骂种族政治无耻?莫怪我听闻一些回教党支持者,都频频称赞中文报好,起码他们的领袖“在野外”(非议员)监督政府还会出现在中文报。

若要说“两种族制”,本人欢迎某君到南马一游,看看这里的州政府是否有效被监督?柔佛州是国阵堡垒区,自行动党创党始,柔行动党在历届中最多仅一席,更多是全军覆没,行动党则从来没突破四席,面对人数占绝大多数的国阵州政府,莫说监督,连对立都无缘。

也由于此,占多数议席的巫统仿如老大般,唯唯诺诺已成了其它成员党的特色。拜308大选所赐,民联在野党才得以增加更多席位,以便能跟有效地监督政府与其政策。以甲州为例,首长莫哈默阿里仍然把“零度在野党”挂在嘴上,毕竟除了行动党,甲巫统自建国始便稳如泰山,回教党也仅在1974年赢过一席。若以种族比率来说,现今的28席中,巫统有18席,马华4席及国大党1席,话事权全交由巫统决定。

以某君的逻辑,是否应该把更多民联议员送进州政府里?相对槟州,柔、甲州尚缺的是非华印裔的代议士,是否应该保送少数的民联巫裔议员进入州议会,“以防种族对立的政治”继续在南马延续、蔓延?看甲州国阵嚣张的态度便可熟知一二,其州议会一点也不健康。

上次州议会,巫统州议员连同首长羞辱赌博是华人“传统”,只有在野党州议员进行反驳,并要求收回诬蔑性言论。国阵那些“代表某族群”的友党竟视若无睹,更行使“大多数暴政”,动议把行动党代议士驱逐出议会,三者更被禁足达半年。

今次州议会,仅剩的两名行动党代议士被国阵群体围攻,不仅在许多发展弊案上“打太极”、“跑野马”,还连续几天羞辱周玉清,要其回槟城“做贤惠妻子”、“侍奉丈夫”。

百姓普遍认为在野党只会乱一乱,没想到国阵身为州政府也不赖,监督者被骂“乱”,起哄者则可免。欲更有效地贯彻两线制,是否应该否决巫统的“两种族制”,送走那些开会默不吭声、拿完津贴走人的“坐板凳”州行政议员呢?

陈勇健

谁才是青蛙?谁才是懦夫?马华是也!


南洋商报马六甲版摘要:


首长:从没赢过哥打拉沙马那州选区 马华应让路进步党


(马六甲5日讯)“马华这么多届大选以来,根本没有在哥打拉沙马那州选区取胜,我说的是事实,马华不应该因此感到生气。”

甲首席部长拿督斯里莫哈末阿里针对记者询问甲州国阵是否会出现成员党交换州选区的情况时,这样发表谈话。

他说,马华多次在哥打拉沙马那州选区上阵,但是从来没有取胜,如果人民进步党有把握在来届大选中上阵,那么他认为应该给予机会,马华不应该感到生气或失望,但是最终的决定权还是在首相纳吉的手上。

他表示,民政党一心想在峇章上阵,如果该党能够赢取民心,巫统并不会在这个地区上阵,反而会给予鼎力的支持。


甲马华同意让出州选区 交换进步党上议员固打

(马六甲5日讯)马六甲州马华同意让人民进步党上阵哥打拉沙马那州选区,交换条件是该党的上议员固打,但马六甲人民进步党认为,如果要用上议员来交换,至少该是亚罗牙也国会选区而非州选区。
人民进步党主席拿督周添财受访时却说,人民进步党可接受马华提出让出上议员的交换条件,但就不是哥打拉沙马那州选区,而是要以马华的亚罗牙也国会选区来交换
他认为,哥打拉沙马那毕竟只是一个州选区上议员属于国会的席位,因此必须以国会对国会作为交换才公平。